I was
really pleased to see column by Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times (See http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-wsj-disability-20150309-column.html#page=1
)responding
to inaccurate and skewed article published by the Wall Street Journal (“WSJ”) on
Monday which cited to outdated statistics to give a very inaccurate portrayal
of the Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) system. Lately, the WSJ seems hell-bent to paint a
picture of a fraud-ridden Social Security Disability system run by grant-happy
judges. The WSJ seeks to portray a large percentage of Social Security
Disability claimants as freeloaders who could work, and the attorneys who
represent them, as snakes in suits who try to manipulate the system in unethical
ways.
This is
not the case. The overwhelming majority of attorneys, judges, and claimants associated
within the Social Security Disability realm are ethical individuals trying to
navigate an increasingly difficult benefit system.
I
personally do not represent anyone whom I do not feel is disabled. In fact, I turn
away many more people than I actually retain due to the fact that I will not represent
anyone who does not meet SSA’s definition of disability in my eyes. I review
the medical records for each claimant before I take on a claim to ensure that
the objective and clinical findings indicate disability. In my opinion, it does
not make sense to take on a case for a person who is not disabled from either
an ethical or a business standpoint.
Likewise,
I do not know of a single Judge in California who will give benefits to a
claimant that he/she does not feel is disabled. Just like the majority of U.S.
workers, SSA judges also pay into the Federal Insurance Compensation Act.
Judges aren’t looking to waste Federal funds. In my vast experience as a Social
Security Disability attorney, I feel the overwhelming majority of judges are
trying to make the right decision in each and every case. There are always grey
cases that require more deliberation and forethought, but most judges are
trying to make decisions that are just.
Lastly,
the vast majority of claimants, in my experience, truly do suffer from severe physical
and mental impairments that are creating employment difficulties for them. Unrepresented
claimants who apply for benefits, who do not meet SSA’s strict standards, often
are not familiar with the exact definition that SSA applies to disability
claims, especially if these individuals are receiving benefits from other
disability programs with different standards – like State Disability and Worker’s
Compensation. Often, no one has
explained to these claimants SSDI requirements, and thus, many unrepresented claimants
are unaware of SSA’s exacting standards. Thus, some individuals do apply for
the program without understanding eligibility requirements. This does not mean
they are trying to fraudulently obtain benefits. It means that SSA has to do a
better job at educating unrepresented claimants as to SSA’s definition of disability.
SSDI is
by no means a ticket to instant wealth. The average monthly benefit amount for
a disabled worker for December 2014 was $1,165, which amounts to an annual
benefit amount of $13,980. The 2015 National Poverty Standard for a single
individual in the 48 contiguous states and the D.C. is $11,770 (See http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/15poverty.cfm#thresholds
). Thus, the average monthly benefit barely keeps
an individual over the national poverty threshold. Most people would choose to
continue to work at a job, where he/she could earn a living wage, rather than
be near poverty thresholds.
There
are exceptions to every rule. There are bad seeds in every facet of life.
However, the few despicable individuals who tarnish the SSDI system should not
be the only faces that irresponsible journalists repeatedly highlight. Just as
judges and attorneys have an ethical obligation to uphold and follow the law, I
just wish that all journalists still practiced the art of fair and balanced
reporting. However, there are bad apples in every barrel and I am thankful to
the journalists out there, like Michael Hiltzik, who still try to provide fair
and balanced news.
Got a question about SSDI or SSI that you
need us to answer? Please check out our website at www.westcoastdisability.com . We try to
provide you with helpful information on our website that will allow you to successfully
navigate the Social Security Disability process. Also, feel free to email me
your questions at megan@westcoastdisability.com or call me at (800)
459-3017 x 103.